<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sue Barton: Neighbourhood Nurse (book #58)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/sue-barton-neighbourhood-nurse-book-58/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/sue-barton-neighbourhood-nurse-book-58/</link>
	<description>recording reading and pictures</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 15:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cassincork</title>
		<link>http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/sue-barton-neighbourhood-nurse-book-58/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>cassincork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/?p=121#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Sorry - shd have made it clear it&#039;s an edition from 1978.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry &#8211; shd have made it clear it&#8217;s an edition from 1978.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maglinty</title>
		<link>http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/sue-barton-neighbourhood-nurse-book-58/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>maglinty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://booksandpictures.wordpress.com/?p=121#comment-129</guid>
		<description>The cover doesn&#039;t look very 1949 does it - more like 1980.  How bizarre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cover doesn&#8217;t look very 1949 does it &#8211; more like 1980.  How bizarre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
